자유게시판

• 목록
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

6. Ben Hogan. "The Modern Fundamentals of Golf." SI 11 Mar 1957; or Hogan, Ben. In 1957 Hogan approached Ravielli as an instance a five part series titled the "The Five Lessons: The modern Fundamentals of Golf." The outcome, which was rapidly turned into a ebook, would develop into, maybe, a very powerful e-book on golf instruction ever written. Five Lessons: The trendy Fundamentals of Golf. In 1954 he began freelancing for Sports Illustrated, illustrating the golf column "Tips from the highest," and later articles by Herbert Warren Wind and on Hogans’ secret grip in 1955. These lead to major articles on the secrets and techniques of professional baseball, the mastery of small boat crusing, the techniques of fly-fishing, and the secrets and techniques of bowling. The brand new York Times seems to be comparable every week - same fonts, same column grid, identical guidelines, and so on. Yet, every day the front web page is totally different - the stories, their order, placement and measurement on the web page differ from everyday, along with the headlines, their dimension, and their placement, (same with photographs, and so forth.). Imagine if day-after-day you walked past your favourite newspaper's bin, there was the identical design, simply new phrases - identical placement, same font dimension, same dimension photo in the same place, everything's the identical.

There are lots of sites that change their headlines, and perhaps a photograph, all through the day - never various the size of any of the headlines, What is sport not deviating from the template whatsoever. Pew must do a study that in some way compares news websites' architecture/design with readership. Editor and Publisher experiences the outcomes of a brand new Pew research that reveals the web news viewers isn't growing. But I believe the lull in users may even have something to do with information websites' design. Make issues pretty, and unpredictable (as Chris says), however maintain the basic structure and individual site logic your users have taken the time to be taught. I believe that customers of stories sites are on particular person missions to get the information, and anything that freaks 'em out or confuses them (i.e., anything dramatically different than what they're used to seeing) will throw them for a loop. Not solely are many sites not designed properly, or are too busy, but far too many websites - in an effort to automate, template, and stagnate the whole lot -- let their front pages be far too predictable. My changing issues around I additionally ought to have talked about consistency -- I want the altering round newspapers do with their entrance pages.

Anyway, this begs for communication between design and growth -- something I've been trying to persuade newspapers to do (by means of the somewhat questionable methodology of begging them to rent me for that very function). It seems like this is the eternal wrestle between design and development that is taking place on the web, right? When i noticed that the brand new York Times was doing the 'digital version' crap, I felt like they were saying that the strictly Web version was inferior to the print product. Sad. Regarding the 2-sport star idea: what has your expertise been in trying to convince conventional print journalists that the web is important? I might add a 3rd party to your "design vs. improvement" struggle: conventional journalists. This might be a whole other animal, however it definitely affects design and improvement. I'm more of a fan of stability -- making sure that design and functionality work in live performance on a web page as an alternative of 1 dominating the other.

This could be a results of the location's content material people not know enough HTML to change the design round a lot, or if the entrance page is constructed with a content system, it in all probability does not provide sufficient flexability. Newspaper designers don't just change the entrance web page design everyday for the hell of it, they do it because the content material has changed and the design should mirror the newsworthiness of the new content. But I observed Derek Powazek left a really positive evaluation of it, so I should most likely check it out. Chris, are you able to point out any examples of news websites that do that, if any? So I believe sites can change things round to a level. Like you, I believe he's occasionally too strict about his ideas. Something like the Stanford-Poynter EyeTrack Study, with less eye monitoring and more behavior tracking. It's more of a holistic viewpoint for Web stuff, although there's some extent the place all-encompassing ideas like that simply turn into plain silliness. Then it naturally led to the web. Somehow this love for data led me to newspaper reporting. To reply your other question, I've all the time had this obsessive-compulsive have to have complete info -- not simply factoids, however the entire story.